Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Med Interne ; 41(10): 693-699, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32861534

RESUMO

Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding is a silent killer. Thus, several studies in different countries have described an increase in mortality, a decrease in the quality of care and prolonged hospital stays associated with ED overcrowding. Causes are multiple: input and in particular lack of access to lab test and imaging for general practitioners, throughput and unnecessary or time-consuming tasks, and output, in particular the availability of hospital beds for unscheduled patients. The main cause of overcrowding is waiting time for available beds in hospital wards, also known as boarding. Solutions to resolve the boarding problem are mostly organisational and require the cooperation of all department and administrative levels through efficient bed management. Elderly and polypathological patients wait longer time in ED. Internal Medicine, is the ideal specialty for these complex patients who require time for observation and evaluation. A strong partnership between the ED and the internal medicine department could help to reduce ED overcrowding by improving care pathways.


Assuntos
Aglomeração , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Administração Hospitalar , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/tendências , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Administração Hospitalar/métodos , Administração Hospitalar/normas , Administração Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Fatores de Tempo
2.
BMC Emerg Med ; 19(1): 4, 2019 01 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30634911

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) is still subject to debate. Although encouraging results of recent studies about outpatient management with chest drains fitted with a one-way valve, no data exist concerning application of this strategy in real life conditions. We assessed how SP are managed in Emergency departments (EDs), in particular the role of outpatient management, the types of interventions and the specialty of the physicians who perform these interventions. METHODS: From June 2009 to May 2013, all cases of spontaneous primary (PSP) and spontaneous secondary pneumothorax (SSP) from EDs of 14 hospitals in France were retrospectively included. First line treatment (observation, aspiration, thoracic drainage or surgery), type of management (admitted, discharged to home directly from the ED, outpatient management) and the specialty of the physicians were collected from the medical files of the ED. RESULTS: Among 1868 SP included, an outpatient management strategy was chosen in 179 PSP (10%) and 38 SSP (2%), mostly when no intervention was performed. Only 25 PSP (1%) were treated by aspiration and discharged to home after ED admission. Observation was the chosen strategy for 985 patients (53%). In 883 patients with an intervention (47%), it was performed by emergency physicians in 71% of cases and thoracic drainage was the most frequent choice (670 patients, 76%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed the low level of implementation of outpatient management for PS in France. Despite encouraging results of studies concerning outpatient management, chest tube drainage and hospitalization remain preponderant in the treatment of SP.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumotórax/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paracentese/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Can Respir J ; 2017: 2729548, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28465661

RESUMO

Introduction. Management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) consists of immediate resolution of pleural air, or observation, and prevention of recurrence. The risk factors for recurrence remain debated. Objectives. We aimed to describe and compare the characteristics of patients presenting a first episode of PSP to those of patients presenting a recurrent PSP, in order to identify factors potentially related to recurrence. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study including all admissions for PSP in the EDs of fourteen French public hospitals from 2009 to 2013. PSP were classified as a first episode if the patient had no previous history of pneumothorax and as recurrence if a previous episode of spontaneous pneumothorax was documented in the patient's medical records or if a recurrence was identified during the inclusion period. To identify factors potentially associated with recurrence of PSP, multilevel logistic models were fitted. Results. During the study period, 918 (61,6%) first episodes and 573 (38,4%) episodes of recurrent PSP were identified. Clinical presentation, age, gender, smoking habits, and use of cannabis were similar in both groups. No clinical factor associated with recurrence was identified by multivariate analysis. Conclusion. In this large multicenter study, no clinical factor associated with recurrence was highlighted.


Assuntos
Pneumotórax/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA